
A game of shadows is the sequel to the eponymously titled first Sherlock film by Guy Madonna Ritchie, which actually surprised me because it was quite good. Being a somewhat cynical Brit, I get slightly irritable when one of our own actors isn’t good enough for a title role of a British caricature but, Robert Downey Jr (or RDJ if you’re lazy) makes Holmes his own in a very eccentric fighting mad detective sort of way. So, hopes were high for the second outing especially since the end of the first film teased us with Holme’s one and only arch foe, Doctor Moriarty. The story is an adaption of the Original Conan Doyle story “The Final Problem”, and it even has a surprising homage to that story. More on that later.
It’s the waning years of the 19th century. Doctor John Watson will soon be getting married and Holmes, well Holmes is doing apparently the same sort of stuff, like preventing bomb’s from going off in a London auction house, bomb’s delivered by his lover Irene Adler, and originating from Moriarty himself. Displeased with the outcome, Moriarty unceremoniously bumps off Irene not even ¼ of the way into the film. You begin to wonder if the movies have caught call of duty syndrome and want to kill off the protagonists willy nilly just for the sake of drama(!) and that the implacable “Character shields” of yesteryear had been cast aside? There is some amusing echoing of future history in the film as even at this early stage in time Europe is a tinderbox and just one thing could start a war, so the game is on to save not only Europe from war but Watson and the life of his new bride.

Fry'd Gold
I enjoyed Game of Shadows but it felt watered down or spread too thin in places. The first one was surprisingly intense, like mistakenly drinking undiluted Robinson’s cordial. It’s not a bad film, the characters are still great and RDJ still amuses and makes Holmes his own. Jude law is the still continually suffering Watson but certainly a man apart and not a sidekick. There is even a wonderful surprise in the form of Stephen Fry as Mycroft, Holmes equally batty brother. I’m not sure there isn’t a role Fry steps into he doesn’t turn into fried gold (or should that be Fry’d?). I’m somewhat disappointed with Moriarty though. The first villain in the series, Lord Blackwood, was a great bad guy, depicted nicely by Mark Strong (who voiced Captain Titus in Space Marine, for teh Emperah!). But I can’t quite figure out Jared Harris’ performance, he gives a good show of being cold and calculated but I was hoping for a bit more panto villain from him considering how loony Holmes can be. Maybe that’s just me. I actually thought Sean Pertwee’s turn as Moriarty in (Ow OW OW! Stop hitting me Tom! Ow!) League of Extraordinary (ow!) Gentleman (OW) was quite decent; then again that poor bloke is almost typecast as a bad guy despite his old man playing the Doctor for a while.

The next Iron Man suit proved a dissapointment...
What I did enjoy was the visual effects, the editing and direction during the action sequences. Credit where its due to the films production team. Bullet time from the matrix has been done to death but somehow this film creates something new, there are jarring tracking shots freeze frame panning sequences and the return of the wonderful “pre planned attacks” that Sherlock cooks up in his head, one that is also turned ON its head in the final duel between Moriarty and Holmes at Reichenbach Falls. Ah yes that finale, it took a while to click but once I realised that a waterfall and Switzerland were involved I began to realise exactly where the film was headed. Although I was surprised they decided not to leave it on a cliff hanger. Also not forgetting Hans Zimmers great soundtrack as well nice to see the continuation of the Sherlock Holmes theme, a sort of big screen chamber music effect that works exceedingly well.
Maybe Guy Ritchie wanted to draw a line under this film in case a third wasn’t produced? I just hope it wasn’t a cop out to the “happy ending crowd”. I’m certain a third film will make its way to us, let’s just hope it’s not watered down anymore. Maybe a Baskerville adaptation would be good, it’s my favourite Sherlock story, with allusions to horror and the supernatural. It’s pretty cool. Despite the minor criticism, it’s a nice adaption of Arthur Conan Doyle’s material. It’s a different take on the source material just like the excellent “Sherlock”, currently showing on the Beeb.
Verdict: WIN
Also if your interested check out the wonderful recent BBC adaption of that featuring Richard Roxburgh, Ian Hart and Richard E Grant, great stuff! And also try to find a animated version called curse of the Baskervilles’. Its what first got me into it, and also convinced me there was some demonic hell hound running about the country lanes of west Yorkshire where I lived at the time…
This review was first published at the mess-hall.co.uk